The Algorithmic Turn in Library and Information Science: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sector Demand, Workforce Transformation, and Ethical Contestation
Executive Intelligence Report: The State of "AI in Libraries"
The library and information science (LIS) sector is currently navigating one of the most profound technological paradigms shifts in its history. This report serves as a definitive confirmation and exhaustive analysis of the user's inquiry regarding the prevalence of searches and interest in "AI in libraries," "AI for libraries," and "AI training for librarians." The evidence gathered from 2023 through early 2026 demonstrates unequivocally that these terms are not merely being searched; they represent the dominant strategic imperative of the profession.
The "search" for AI in libraries is no longer a niche inquiry by early adopters. It has metastasized into a sector-wide mandate, evidenced by a massive restructuring of professional development curricula, a transformation of the vendor ecosystem (EBSCO, OCLC, Clarivate), and a radical redefinition of library job roles. The industry has moved past the initial phase of "technological curiosity" into a phase of "strategic implementation" and "existential defense," where the search for "AI training" is driven by a workforce facing a critical skills gap.
This report synthesizes data from Association of Research Libraries (ARL) polls, IMLS grant narratives, vendor roadmaps, academic syllabi, and employment market trends to provide a granular view of this transformation. It explores the operational, educational, and ethical dimensions of the AI turn in libraries, validating that the search volume for these topics correlates directly with a massive reallocation of resources and attention within the field.
________________
1. The Anatomy of Demand: Validating the "Search" for AI
The user's query asks if "anyone is searching" for AI-related library terms. The answer is found not just in search engine logs, but in the frantic activity of the LIS ecosystem. The "search" is visible in the rapid saturation of conference tracks, the sell-out rates of training courses, and the strategic pivots of billion-dollar library service platforms.
1.1 From Curiosity to Strategic Necessity
The trajectory of interest has been steep and unrelenting. In April 2023, the sector's engagement with AI was characterized by tentative exploration - librarians asking, "What is this?" By January 2025, the nature of the inquiry had shifted to "How do we govern this?" and "How do we pay for this?".1
Data from the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) tracks this evolution with precision. In early 2023, only 10% of research libraries had moved beyond the exploratory phase into active implementation. By early 2025, that figure had nearly tripled to 28%, with an additional 53% of libraries deeply entrenched in exploratory testing.1 This statistical surge confirms that searches for "AI implementation in libraries" are translating into operational reality.
The "Pulse of the Library" report by Clarivate further validates this demand. It found that over 60% of libraries are actively planning or evaluating AI integration.2 This is not a passive interest; it is an active search for solutions. The drivers of this search behavior are aligned with the core existential missions of the library:
* Student Learning Support: 52% of libraries cite this as their primary motivation.2
* Research Excellence: 47% are searching for AI to accelerate scholarly discovery.2
* Content Discoverability: 45% are seeking AI to fix broken discovery layers.2
The Springer Nature survey of over 2,000 researchers provides the external pressure fueling this internal search. With more than 50% of researchers already using AI to write or read papers, and 80% planning to continue, libraries are forced to search for AI solutions simply to remain compatible with the workflows of their patrons.3 If a library does not support AI-mediated research, it risks obsolescence. Thus, the search for "AI in libraries" is effectively a search for relevance in a transformed scholarly ecosystem.
1.2 The "Search" as Evidenced by Conference Activity
One of the strongest proxies for professional "search" volume is conference programming. When professionals pay to attend sessions, they are voting with their budgets. The 2025-2026 conference circuit is dominated by the specific keywords mentioned in the user's query.
* ALA Annual 2025: The American Library Association\'s schedule is saturated with AI content. Sessions such as "Reimagining How Work Gets Done Leveraging GenAI" and pre-conference workshops like "Technology and AI Strategies for Legal Management Professionals" indicate that "AI training" is the headliner of the industry\'s largest gathering.4 The sheer volume of programming - ranging from "Future-Ready: AI in Action" to roundtables on the "Ethics of AI" - demonstrates that thousands of librarians are actively seeking this specific knowledge.5
* IFLA's Global Agenda: The International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) has dedicated entire satellite meetings to these topics, such as the event in Kazakhstan titled "Artificial Intelligence, Bibliographic Control and Legal Matters".6 The existence of an "AI Special Interest Group" (AI-SIG) within IFLA, which organizes global webinars and symposiums, proves that the search for "AI in libraries" is a transnational phenomenon, spanning from Doha to Texas.7
* Specialized Symposia: Beyond general conferences, we see the emergence of AI-specific events like the "Generative AI in Libraries (GAIL)" conference and the "Kansas State University AI Symposium".8 The creation of these niche events confirms that the general "search" for information has become deep enough to sustain entire standalone gatherings.
1.3 User Expectations: The External "Search" Pressure
Librarians are searching for AI answers because their users are demanding AI services. Students entering universities today possess what Letícia Antunes Nogueira calls an expectation of "ubiquity" regarding AI.3 They do not search for "books"; they expect to search with AI systems that recommend, synthesize, and retrieve.
This is corroborated by user satisfaction studies. A survey in Reference Services Review found that nearly 70% of library users have a positive view of AI-assisted services.9 More importantly, the specific tools they desire map perfectly to the user's query about "AI for libraries":
* 88.27% want Virtual Library Assistants.
* 86.08% want NLP Search Engines.
* 85.64% want Intelligent Resource Recommendation Systems.9
This data proves that the "search" is bidirectional: librarians are searching for how to provide AI, and patrons are searching for libraries that offer it.
________________
2. The Great Upskilling: "AI Training for Librarians"
The user specifically asked about "AI training for librarians" and "AI training for librarian staff." The deep search reveals that this is perhaps the single most critical pain point in the sector. There is a massive disparity between the technology\'s availability and the workforce\'s ability to use it, creating a booming market for training.
2.1 The Skills Gap Crisis
The demand for "AI training" is driven by anxiety and necessity. The Clarivate report explicitly identifies the "skills gap" as the number one impact of AI on library employment, cited by 52% of respondents.2 Alarmingly, nearly one-third of these professionals reported that no training was available to them at their institutions.2
This deficit is detailed further in studies of academic librarians, which show a "moderate" level of AI literacy. While librarians understand the concepts (e.g., they know what ChatGPT is), they lack "hands-on experience" and "trust" in the tools.10 They can identify the tools but cannot yet effectively integrate them into complex research workflows like systematic reviews or metadata remediation. This gap between awareness and competence is exactly what is driving the high search volume for "AI training."
2.2 Analysis of Training Curricula and Syllabi
To satisfy the user's request, we have analyzed the specific content of the training programs that have emerged to fill this gap. These syllabi provide a "fingerprint" of exactly what librarians are searching for.
2.2.1 Library Juice Academy: The Practical "How-To"
Library Juice Academy (LJA) has developed a suite of courses that directly address the practical "AI training" query. Their course catalog reveals a segmented approach to training:
* "Introduction to AI and Metadata: Uses with Library Data" 11:
* Target Audience: Catalogers and Systems Librarians.
* Curriculum: This course goes beyond basics. It teaches the "implementation of AI processes" specifically for "analyzing and remediating metadata." It covers the intersection of AI with MARC and Dublin Core formats. This proves librarians are searching for highly technical, task-specific AI applications, not just general overviews.
* "Practical AI for Librarians: Tools and Applications in Everyday Work" 12:
* Target Audience: Public and Reference Librarians.
* Curriculum: This 4-week course is operational. It covers tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity.ai, and Canva Magic Write. The syllabus includes "prompt engineering" (though LJA avoids the buzzword, implied by "formulate language"), "reference support," and "outreach." The deliverable is a "sample policy" or "workflow," indicating that librarians are searching for governance templates as much as tool instruction.
* "AI and Libraries for Skeptics" 13:
* Target Audience: The "Refusal" contingency.
* Curriculum: This course validates the existence of the "AI Refusal" search term. It covers "vendor AI products" through a "critical lens," focusing on the "difference between what the promise of AI is compared to the reality." This indicates a demand for defensive training - learning about AI to resist it or mitigate its harms.
2.2.2 San José State University (SJSU) iSchool: The Academic Certification
For those seeking deeper credentialing, SJSU has launched a Human-Centered AI (HCAI) Certificate. This 9-unit program 14 represents the formalization of "AI training for librarians" into an academic discipline.
* ISDA 080: Introduction to Human-Centered AI: Covers the "lifecycle" of AI and its impacts on culture.
* ISDA 081: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: This is a key area of search interest. The syllabus covers "algorithmic bias," "due process," "transparency," and "legal liability." This confirms that "AI training" in libraries is heavily weighted toward legal and ethical compliance.
* ISDA 181: AI and Knowledge Management: This elective links AI to the business strategy of libraries, focusing on "enterprise AI implementations."
2.2.3 EBSCO and ALA Offerings
* EBSCO's AI Literacy Short Course: This vendor-provided training focuses on the "unique skillset" of librarians to teach AI literacy to others. It emphasizes the "AI Tenets" of privacy and security.16
* ALA Core Webinars: These sessions, such as "Future-Ready: AI in Action," focus on peer-to-peer learning ("panelists will share ways in which AI is impacting user services").17 This suggests librarians are searching for case studies and "social proof" that AI works in settings similar to their own.
2.3 The TPACK Framework in AI Training
A deeper insight from the research is the pedagogical shift toward the TPACK Framework (Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge) for AI training.18
* TK (Technological Knowledge): Understanding how LLMs work (probabilistic prediction vs. knowledge retrieval).
* PK (Pedagogical Knowledge): Knowing how to teach with AI.
* CK (Content Knowledge): Knowing the domain (e.g., history, biology) well enough to verify AI outputs.
The research suggests that effective "AI training for librarians" must integrate all three. Training that only focuses on "how to use ChatGPT" (TK) fails because it doesn't address how to integrate it into information literacy instruction (PK) or how to spot hallucinations in specialized topics (CK).18
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of AI Training Offerings
Provider
Course/Program
Focus Area
Key Competencies Addressed
Target Audience
Source
Library Juice Academy
Intro to AI & Metadata
Technical/Cataloging
MARC/Dublin Core remediation, data quality
Technical Services Staff
11
Library Juice Academy
Practical AI for Librarians
Operational/Reference
Prompt engineering, ChatGPT, Perplexity, policy creation
Public/Reference Staff
12
SJSU iSchool
Human-Centered AI Certificate
Academic/Ethical
Algorithmic bias, legal liability, AI lifecycle
MLIS Students/Career Switchers
14
EBSCO
AI Literacy Short Course
Information Literacy
Teaching AI literacy, privacy/security tenets
Academic Librarians
16
ALA Core
Future-Ready Webinars
Strategic/Management
Case studies, change management, service impact
Library Leadership
17
________________
3. The New Library Workforce: "AI Librarian" Jobs
The user's query about "AI for librarian staff" touches on a fundamental reshaping of the labor market. The search for "AI" is now a search for talent. We are witnessing the birth of the "AI Librarian" as a distinct professional category.
3.1 The Rise of the "AI Librarian" Title
In 2024 and 2025, job titles explicitly containing "Artificial Intelligence" began to appear with regularity in academic and research libraries. These are not merely IT roles; they are hybrid roles combining domain expertise with AI fluency.
* Senior Assistant Librarian for Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (California State University): With a salary range up to $182,530, this position commands significantly higher compensation than traditional roles. The responsibilities include providing guidance on "AI-powered research tools" and familiarity with "discipline-specific emerging technologies".19 This salary band indicates that institutions view AI expertise as a specialized skill, valued significantly higher than traditional reference roles.
* Emerging Technologies/AI Librarian (University of Nebraska Omaha): This tenure-track position ($58k-$74k) focuses on "digital literacy" and "ethical integration." The job description explicitly asks for a "confident teaching librarian" who can consult on "integrating AI... into the academic research process".20
* Discovery Librarian (Boise State University): This role bridges the old and new worlds. The mandate is to "bridge traditional cataloging practices with advanced AI-driven tools." The job explicitly requires leading "metadata creation... including the integration of AI tools".21
3.2 Evolution of Existing Roles
Beyond specific "AI" titles, standard library jobs are absorbing AI responsibilities.
* Digital Services Librarians: In Omaha and elsewhere, these roles now require managing "digital assets" within systems that are increasingly AI-mediated (Adobe AEM, DAM systems).22
* Health Sciences Librarians: At institutions like Stony Brook, these roles now intersect with "Library Data Scientist" positions, requiring the ability to manage data that feeds into systematic reviews - a process increasingly automated by AI.23
3.3 The Competency Profile of the New Librarian
Based on the ALA AI Competencies Draft (March 2025) and the analyzed job postings, the "search" for staff is actually a search for a specific set of four competencies 24:
1. Dispositions: A willingness to "experiment" and "fail" with AI tools. The "AI Librarian" must be curious but critical.
2. Analysis & Evaluation: The ability to audit an AI tool. Can the librarian explain why the AI recommended this book? Can they identify the bias in the training data?
3. Use & Application: Practical prompt engineering. The ability to "formulate language for optimal AI output."
4. Ethical Advocacy: The ability to advocate for "equitable access." If the library subscribes to a higher-cost AI tool, who gets to use it? The librarian is the gatekeeper of equity here.
This data confirms that "training for librarian staff" is not just about upskilling existing employees; it is about defining the requirements for the next generation of hires.
________________
4. The Vendor Ecosystem: "AI for Libraries" as a Product
When users search for "AI for libraries," they are often searching for software. The library vendor ecosystem - dominated by a few massive players - is aggressively pivoting to AI, effectively forcing adoption upon libraries.
4.1 The Integration of Generative AI into Discovery
The primary application of AI in libraries is in Discovery - the search interface patrons use to find materials.
* EBSCO's AI Insights & Natural Language Search (NLS): EBSCO has deployed RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) technology. When a user searches, the AI generates a "short list of key insights" from full-text articles. Crucially, EBSCO markets this with a "Human-in-the-Loop" guarantee, stating that these insights are "vetted by EBSCO librarians".25 This addresses the "hallucination" fear directly.
* Clarivate/Ex Libris: Their Primo Research Assistant allows users to ask natural language questions (e.g., "What are the impacts of climate change on migration?") and receive a narrated answer with citations.26 This fundamentally changes the library catalog from a list of links to an answer engine.
* OCLC's WorldCat AI: OCLC is using AI for metadata management. Their system automates the classification of subjects and merges duplicate records (a massive problem in shared catalogs).27 They claim this has saved "13,600 hours of processing time" for library staff.
4.2 The "Black Box" Dilemma
While these tools offer efficiency, they introduce a significant ethical problem known as the "Black Box" issue. As noted in the research, "it is not always clear how they make choices".28
* If an AI-driven acquisition tool decides a library shouldn't buy a certain controversial book, is that a neutral algorithm or censorship?
* If a discovery tool suppresses certain search results because its training data was biased, the library has failed its mission of neutrality.
Librarians are increasingly searching for "Explainable AI" (XAI) solutions to mitigate this risk, demanding transparency from vendors like ProQuest and EBSCO about how their algorithms rank results.28
4.3 Environmental & Economic Concerns
The search for "AI for libraries" also uncovers anxiety about costs. The "Pulse of the Library" report notes that "tight budgets" are a top concern (47%).2 AI tools are often sold as add-on subscriptions at additional cost. There is a fear that AI will create a two-tiered library system: wealthy academic libraries with "smart" AI agents, and underfunded public libraries with basic search, furthering the digital divide.
Additionally, the environmental cost of AI (water and energy consumption of data centers) is a rising topic of search and concern, with vendors like EBSCO now having to field questions about their "AI carbon footprint".29
________________
5. The "AI Refusal" Movement: The Counter-Search
A unique and vital finding of this deep search is the existence of a robust "AI Refusal" movement. This validates the user's query about "anyone searching," but with a twist: they are searching for ways to stop or limit AI.
5.1 The Architecture of Refusal
This is not unthinking Luddism; it is a critical, ethical stance. We found specific resources dedicated to this:
* "Alliance for Refusing Generative AI": A discord server and community space for humanists and librarians who resist the "hype".30
* "A Librarian Against AI" (Zine): Published by Violet Fox, this 32-page document uses the ALA Code of Ethics to argue that AI is "antithetical" to librarianship due to its reliance on theft (training data) and environmental harm.30
* "AI Is Very Bad, Actually" (Manifesto): A widely circulated document by librarian Julie Setele that frames AI integration as "magic" masking corporate overreach.30
5.2 The Privacy & Surveillance Argument
The strongest argument for refusal is privacy. AI systems are data-hungry. They require user interaction data to "learn" and personalize.
* The Surveillance Threat: Research warns that AI systems in libraries could "de-anonymize data or create detailed user profiles," leading to a loss of privacy.31
* The Vendor Loophole: Even if a library protects data, the third-party AI vendor might not. Librarians are searching for "data minimization" strategies to ensure they aren't inadvertently feeding patron reading habits to surveillance capitalism networks.28
5.3 Operational Resistance: The "Hallucination" Fatigue
Operational resistance comes from the front lines. Librarians are exhausted by "hallucinations" - patrons demanding books that ChatGPT invented.
* The "Secret Book" Problem: Staff report interactions where patrons become aggressive, believing the library is "hiding" a book that ChatGPT said existed. This has forced libraries to train staff in "hallucination management" - a new, uncompensated form of labor.32
* Refusal as Care: Some ethicists in the field argue for "refusal as a form of care," suggesting that by refusing to deploy unreliable AI, libraries are protecting their patrons from misinformation.34
________________
6. Public vs. Academic Libraries: A Divergent Path
The "search" for AI looks different depending on the type of library.
6.1 Academic Libraries: The Research Engine
In academic settings (universities), the focus is on high-velocity research.
* Use Cases: Systematic reviews, metadata generation, and "AI literacy" instruction for students.35
* Adoption Rate: Higher. 28% active implementation.1
* Key Pressure: Faculty and students are already using it. The library must catch up to support "AI-assisted" scholarship.
6.2 Public Libraries: The Democratic Gateway
In public libraries, the focus is on Digital Inclusion and Civic Engagement.
* Use Cases: "AI Labs" (e.g., San Francisco Public Library) where patrons can try tools they can't afford at home.36
* Key Pressure: Bridging the digital divide. As AI becomes a paid utility, public libraries are becoming the "access point of last resort" for the poor to access AI tools necessary for job applications and modern life.37
* Grant Activity: The Urban Libraries Council (ULC) is actively funding "civic engagement" pilots in libraries like Palo Alto and Queens to teach the public about AI, not just with AI.37
________________
7. The Funding Landscape: Who is Paying for This?
The user's query about "anyone searching" is definitively answered by the flow of money. Grant-making bodies are actively soliciting and funding AI projects in libraries.
7.1 IMLS National Leadership Grants
The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) has prioritized AI in its FY2025/2026 cycles.
* University of North Texas: Received $132,759 to investigate "LLMs running locally" to assist catalogers. This proves a search for open-source, local AI solutions to avoid the privacy issues of big corporate models.38
* Responsible AI Toolkit: IMLS funded Montana State University to build "Viewfinder," a toolkit for ethical AI decision-making.39
7.2 The Knight Foundation & Philanthropy
The Knight Foundation awarded $2 million to Plug and Play to launch an "AI Center of Excellence" in San Jose, connecting startups with corporate partners, academia, and civic organizations.40 This indicates that philanthropists are investing in local AI ecosystems that libraries could engage with as community technology hubs.
________________
8. Global Context & Future Outlook
8.1 International Governance (IFLA & UNESCO)
The search for AI governance is global. IFLA's 2025/2026 calendar includes major symposiums on "Bibliographic Control" in the age of AI.6 UNESCO reports that nearly two-thirds of universities globally are developing AI guidance.41 This confirms that the "search" for policy frameworks is a transnational priority.
8.2 The "Agentic" Future (2026 and Beyond)
The report identifies a future trend: the move from Chatbots to Agents.
* Current AI (2024) summarizes text.
* Future AI (2026+) will do things: "Find this book, download the PDF, and email it to me."
* Implication: Libraries are currently searching for how to make their data "machine-actionable" so that these future AI agents can interact with library catalogs. If library data is not "agent-ready," libraries will disappear from the digital workflow of users.42
________________
Conclusion
To the user asking "is anyone searching for this," the evidence is overwhelming.
* Librarians are searching for training to save their jobs.2
* Administrators are searching for policies to govern safe use.24
* Vendors are searching for integrations to sell higher-cost subscriptions.25
* The "Resistance" is searching for ethical arguments to slow the machine down.30
The search volume for "AI in libraries" represents the sector's collective attempt to grapple with its future. We are past the point of "if" AI will be adopted; the industry is now deep in the turbulent "how." The divergence between the "efficiency" narrative (driven by vendors/admin) and the "ethics" narrative (driven by practitioners/refusers) is the defining conflict of the next decade in Library and Information Science. The existence of specialized job titles, six-figure grants, and dedicated certificate programs proves that this is not a fad, but a structural reorganization of the field.
________________
9. Appendix: Detailed Data & Snippet Analysis
Table 2: The "AI Librarian" Job Market (2024-2025)
Analysis of specific job postings confirming the professionalization of the "AI search."
Job Title
Institution
Salary
Key Mandate
Source
Senior Assistant Librarian (Engineering & AI)
California State University
$182k (max)
Guide faculty on "AI-powered research tools"; integrate AI into engineering curriculum.
19
Emerging Technologies/AI Librarian
University of Nebraska Omaha
$58k - $74k
"Champion the ethical... integration of AI"; lead AI literacy instruction.
20
Discovery Librarian
Boise State University
$67k - $82k
"Bridge traditional cataloging... with AI-driven tools"; metadata cleanup via AI.
21
Health Sciences Librarian
Stony Brook University
Tenure Track
Data science integration; systematic review automation.
23
Table 3: The Training Ecosystem
Specific curricula found in the deep search, validating "AI training for librarians" demand.
Provider
Course Name
Core Syllabus Elements
Insight
Source
Library Juice Academy
Intro to AI & Metadata
MARC/Dublin Core remediation; AI for data quality.
Focus on technical services and backend operations.
11
Library Juice Academy
Practical AI for Librarians
Prompt engineering; Policy creation; Outreach tools (Canva).
Focus on public services and operational efficiency.
12
SJSU iSchool
Human-Centered AI Certificate
Algorithmic bias; Legal liability; AI lifecycle; Knowledge Management.
Academic, credit-bearing credentialing for career advancement.
14
Library Juice Academy
AI for Skeptics
Critical lens on vendors; "Hype vs. Reality"; Ethics of refusal.
Addresses the "Refusal" demographic explicitly.
13
Table 4: Major Funding Initiatives
Evidence of "AI for libraries" appearing in grant narratives.
Funder
Grant Program
Recipient/Focus
Amount
Source
Knight Foundation
AI Center of Excellence
Plug and Play (San Jose)
$2 Million
40
IMLS
National Leadership Grants
Univ. of North Texas (Local LLMs for Cataloging)
$132,759
38
IMLS
National Leadership Grants
Montana State Univ. (Responsible AI Toolkit)
Grant Funded
39
Urban Libraries Council
AI Research Partnerships
Palo Alto, Queens, Frisco Public Libraries
Grant Funded
37
Works cited
1. Tracking the AI Evolution in Research Libraries: Findings from ARL's ..., accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.arl.org/blog/tracking-the-ai-evolution-in-research-libraries-findings-from-arls-third-ai-quick-poll/
2. Pulse of the Library 2024 | Clarivate, accessed January 20, 2026, https://clarivate.com/pulse-of-the-library/report-2024/
3. How libraries and publishers are shaping the future of AI in research | For Librarians | Springer Nature, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/the-link/technology-blogpost/ai-tools-research-support-library-publisher-insights/27825670
4. 2025 ALA Annual Agenda - ALA's 2025 Annual Conference & Expo, accessed January 20, 2026, https://plus.mcievents.com/event/d6428d6f-8926-43bb-b85e-fb073cd8d6b5/2025-ala-annual-agenda
5. Highlights from ALA 2025 - Countway Library, accessed January 20, 2026, https://countway.harvard.edu/news/highlights-ala-2025
6. Artificial Intelligence, Bibliographic Control and Legal Matters: Navigating New Horizons, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ifla.org/events/artificial-intelligence-bibliographic-control-and-legal-matters-navigating-new-horizons/
7. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Libraries and Librarianship - IFLA, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ifla.org/events/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-libraries-and-librarianship/
8. Core Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Libraries Interest Group - ALA Connect, accessed January 20, 2026, https://connect.ala.org/core/communities/community-home/digestviewer?CommunityKey=c6ad80f9-1866-4041-801e-a9bccb7c9a72
9. Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into academic library services: user opinions in Türkiye - Emerald Publishing, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.emerald.com/rsr/article/53/2/95/1300878/Integration-of-artificial-intelligence-AI
10. 224 IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) LITERACY IN RESEARCH PRACTICES AMONG ACADEMIC LIBRARIANS IN COLLEGES OF EDUCATION IN - Scholarly Journals, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.gojamss.net/index.php/IJLIT/article/download/1394/1426
11. Introduction to AI and Metadata: Uses with Library Data - Library ..., accessed January 20, 2026, https://libraryjuiceacademy.com/shop/course/356-introduction-to-ai-and-metadata-uses-with-library-data/
12. Practical AI for Librarians: Tools and Applications in Everyday Work ..., accessed January 20, 2026, https://libraryjuiceacademy.com/shop/course/372-practical-ai-for-librarians-tools-and-applications-in-everyday-work/
13. AI and Libraries, for Skeptics, accessed January 20, 2026, https://libraryjuiceacademy.com/shop/course/331-ai-and-libraries-for-skeptics/
14. HCAI Academics - SJSU - School of Information - SJSU iSchool, accessed January 20, 2026, https://ischool.sjsu.edu/hcai-academics
15. Program: Advanced AI Core Technologies and Applications in Computer Science Certificate - San José State University - SJSU Catalog, accessed January 20, 2026, https://catalog.sjsu.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=17&poid=15917
16. AI Resources for Libraries | EBSCO, accessed January 20, 2026, https://about.ebsco.com/artificial-intelligence/resources
17. Future-Ready: AI in Action in Public, Academic, and Special Libraries | ALA, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ala.org/events/future-ready-ai-action-public-academic-and-special-libraries
18. Evaluating AI Literacy in Academic Libraries: A Survey Study with a Focus on U.S. Employees | Lo, accessed January 20, 2026, https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/26409/34344
19. Emerging Technologies Librarian Jobs in California - ZipRecruiter, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Jobs/Emerging-Technologies-Librarian/--in-California
20. Emerging Technologies Librarian, Assistant Professor Job Opening in Omaha, Nebraska, accessed January 20, 2026, https://joblist.ala.org/job/emerging-technologies-librarian-assistant-professor/81895804/
21. Idaho - Library jobs in Colorado and beyond, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.libraryjobline.org/states/ID
22. $48k-$140k Digital Services Librarian Jobs in Omaha, NE - ZipRecruiter, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Jobs/Digital-Services-Librarian/-in-Omaha,NE
23. Jobs | - ACRL/NY, accessed January 20, 2026, https://acrlny.marketinglibraries.org/jobs-2/
24. 2025-03-05 Draft: AI Competencies for Academic Library Workers, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/AI_Competencies_Draft.pdf
25. EBSCO Information Services Launches Newest Artificial Intelligence Features - News, accessed January 20, 2026, https://about.ebsco.com/news-center/press-releases/ebsco-information-services-launches-newest-artificial-intelligence-features
26. AI in Library Services: Transform Academic Operations - Ex Libris, accessed January 20, 2026, https://exlibrisgroup.com/blog/harnessing-the-power-of-ai-in-academic-libraries/
27. OCLC Annual Report 2024 - 2025 - : - Unwavering dedication to the library community, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.oclc.org/en/annual-report/2025/home.html
28. Ethical and Privacy Challenges of AI in Libraries - ResearchGate, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396274272_Ethical_and_Privacy_Challenges_of_AI_in_Libraries
29. EBSCO Information Services in 2025 - NewsBreaks, accessed January 20, 2026, https://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/EBSCO-Information-Services-in-2025-171069.asp
30. AI Refusal in Libraries: A Starter Guide - ACRLog, accessed January 20, 2026, https://acrlog.org/2025/06/11/ai-refusal-in-libraries-a-starter-guide/
31. Data Privacy and Security Concerns in AI- Enabled Libraries - IJFMR, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/6/64626.pdf
32. Librarians promoting AI : r/Libraries - Reddit, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Libraries/comments/1ockaxz/librarians_promoting_ai/
33. Librarians Are Tired of Being Accused of Hiding Secret Books That Were Made Up by AI - Reddit, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/1pkgupb/librarians_are_tired_of_being_accused_of_hiding/
34. Research & Evidence Synthesis Librarian - Association of Research Libraries, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.arl.org/job-posting/research-evidence-synthesis-librarian/
36. How Public Libraries Are Teaching AI and Digital Literacy Skills [1] - INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES NETWORK (INFOLIBNET) - Ethiopia - Africa, accessed January 20, 2026, https://mylibrarianship.wordpress.com/2025/06/24/%F0%9F%93%9A%F0%9F%A4%96-how-public-libraries-are-teaching-ai-and-digital-literacy-skills-1/
37. AI Research Partnership with CTG UAlbany - Urban Libraries Council, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.urbanlibraries.org/initiatives/research-and-data/ai-research
38. NLG-L Recipient, LG-256666-OLS-24 - Institute of Museum and Library Services, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/project-proposals/lg-256666-ols-24-full-proposal.pdf
39. Responsible AI - MSU Library | Montana State University, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.lib.montana.edu/responsible-ai/
40. Knight Foundation Awards $2 Million Grant to Plug and Play to Advance AI Innovation in San Jose, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.plugandplaytechcenter.com/press/knight-foundation-announcement?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=2025_Plug%20and%20Play%20Announcement
41. UNESCO survey: Two-thirds of higher education institutions have or are developing guidance on AI use, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-two-thirds-higher-education-institutions-have-or-are-developing-guidance-ai-use
42. Full article: The Librarian Skillset and the Needs of Artificial Intelligence - Taylor & Francis, accessed January 20, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639374.2025.2539787