[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Part 5 Performance Monitoring & Accountability

You've signed a contract. The system is live. Now: how do you know if the vendor is actually keeping their promises?

The Vendor Evaluation Framework

This is the final post in a complete framework for evaluating and managing vendor relationships. Use these five dimensions together to make confident, mission-aligned decisions.

The Question: How Do You Know They're Keeping Their Promises?

You\'ve done the work. You\'ve evaluated the vendor carefully, negotiated a contract, and deployed their system into production. Your team is using it. Your community is depending on it.

Now comes a question that doesn't feel urgent but absolutely is: How do you know the vendor is actually keeping their promises?

It's easy to assume they will. The contract says they should. The first few months feel smooth. But vendor relationships are living things. Performance degrades. Attention shifts. Priority slips. And you need a system to catch it early, before problems become crises.

Why This Matters: Vendor Degradation Is Slow and Gradual

The danger of vendor relationships is that they rarely fail suddenly. Instead, they degrade gradually:

If you're not watching, you won\'t notice until you're deep in a problem that should have been caught months ago.

The antidote is accountabilitynot in a punitive sense, but in a transparent, measurable sense. You track whether the vendor is meeting their promises. You make that data visible. And you act on it when things start to slip.

What to Monitor: A Practical System

Here's what actually matters. Not just SLAs on paper, but the metrics and practices that tell you if your vendor relationship is healthy:

1. SLA Compliance Tracking (Monthly)

Your contract probably includes SLAs. Uptime targets. Response time commitments. Bug fix windows. The problem is that SLAs are only useful if you actually track them.

Create a simple monthly report:

SLA Metric Target Actual Status
System Uptime 99.9% 99.95% ✓ Met
Support Response (P1) 4 hours 6 hours ✗ Missed
Support Response (P2) 24 hours 19 hours ✓ Met
Bug Fix (Critical) 48 hours 48 hours ✓ Met

This takes 30 minutes monthly. It creates a paper trail. And it makes visible what\'s working and what\'s not.

2. Feature and Performance Metrics

SLAs tell you if the vendor is maintaining what they have. These metrics tell you if they're actually improving:

Track these in a simple spreadsheet. Update quarterly. Look for trends.

3. Annual Vendor Review (4 Critical Questions)

Once a year, sit down with your vendor relationship manager and ask these four questions directly:

  1. "Are you still invested in our success?" Listen for specificity about your needs, not generic answers. Do they know your challenges?
  2. "If we were choosing a vendor today, would you still win?" This is honest. It forces both sides to think about alternatives. A healthy vendor should say yes confidently
  3. "What are we missing? What should we be using better?" A good vendor points out gaps and untapped potential
  4. "What do you need from us to deliver better?" Maybe they need better data. More feedback. Clearer requirements. This conversation matters

Document the answers. This isn\'t a gotchait\'s a reality check for both sides.

4. Escalation Triggers (Specific Thresholds)

You need rules of engagement. When do you escalate? When do you demand action? Here are thresholds that matter:

Escalate immediately if:
  • Any production incident unresolved for 4+ hours
  • Any SLA missed without acknowledgment within 48 hours
  • Data loss or corruption incident occurs
  • Support escalation is not responded to by promised deadline (twice in 30 days)
  • Vendor disappears from communication for 5+ business days on active issue

When you escalate, escalate high. Go from support contact to account manager. From account manager to VP of customer success. Make it clear: this threshold has been crossed, and it matters.

5. Exit Decision Framework (Know Your Breaking Points)

You need to know in advance: under what conditions would we leave this vendor? Knowing this clarifies your thinking and sets boundaries:

These aren\'t threats. They\'re guardrails. They tell you when to take action before a relationship becomes untenable.

Red Flags That Matter

Watch for these warning signs. They're often subtle, but they predict problems:

🚩 Missing SLAs without acknowledgment. Not "we missed, here\'s why, here\'s our corrective plan." Just silence. Or a generic "we\'re looking into it." This suggests your relationship isn\'t important enough for transparency.
🚩 Support response getting slower. Not a one-time delay. A pattern. First response times creeping. Callbacks taking longer. This is your canary in the coal mine.
🚩 Escalations disappearing or getting closed without resolution. You escalate an issue. Your escalation contact says "I\'ll look into it." Then nothing. Weeks pass. You follow up. "Oh, we thought that was resolved." It\'s not. This suggests your vendor isn't taking your feedback seriously.
🚩 Dismissing your complaints as user error. Every issue is "working as designed" or "you need to configure it differently." A healthy vendor sometimes says "you're right, we should fix this." A struggling vendor always deflects.
🚩 Lack of roadmap or transparency about future direction. You ask "what\'s coming?" and get vague answers. Or worse, the vendor roadmap has nothing that addresses your stated needs. This vendor isn\'t building for you; they're building for someone else.
🚩 Key personnel turnover on your account. Your account manager leaves. So does their replacement. Then the replacement after that. You keep reintroducing yourself and your context. This is a sign the vendor doesn't value the relationship.

Accountability Through a Mission Lens

Remember: you're doing this for your community. Vendor accountability isn\'t bureaucratic busywork. It's how you ensure that the tools your community depends on actually work as promised.

When you track SLAs, you're making sure your users have consistent, reliable service. When you review escalations, you're ensuring that problems get fixednot ignored. When you have that annual conversation, you're confirming that your vendor still cares about your mission.

Accountability is community care. It's how you keep the promises you made to the people who depend on you.

Series Conclusion: Your Complete Framework

You now have a complete framework for vendor relationships:

The Five Dimensions

Together, these five dimensions protect you from bad vendor relationships and help you build good ones.

They take time, yes. The monthly SLA tracking takes 30 minutes. The annual review takes 2-3 hours. The escalation management might take a few hours a quarter.

But consider what it costs if you don\'t do this: a vendor relationship that slowly degrades, a system your community can\'t rely on, a team spending energy firefighting preventable problems, and eventually the expensive, disruptive process of switching vendors.

The framework prevents that. Use it.

Next Steps

Here's what to do Monday morning:

  1. Review your current vendor contracts. What SLAs are promised? Create a tracking template
  2. Schedule your first monthly SLA review for next month. Make it a 30-minute calendar block
  3. Set a calendar reminder for your annual vendor review (pick a date 1 year out)
  4. Write down your exit decision framework. When would you leave this vendor? Be specific
  5. Share this framework with your team. Make accountability a team responsibility, not just yours

Use This Framework in Your Org

You now have a complete system for evaluating and managing vendors in a way that's fair, transparent, and mission-aligned. Use it. Adapt it to your context. And build vendor relationships that actually work.

Questions? Challenges? This framework works better when it's tested in the real world and refined based on what you learn.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]